Hierarchy in the field of tension between competing expectations
Folgen der Einführung postbürokratischer Arbeitsweisen in Großorganisationen
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30820/0942-2285-2021-1-72Keywords:
Post-bureaucracy, hierarchy, organizational sociology, equivalence-functionalism, functional analysisAbstract
This article explores the question of what consequences of the introduction of post-bureaucratic organizing in large-scale organizations can be observed regarding the handling of hierarchy and how these can be located from an organizational sociological point of view. Our goal is to add a differentiated perspective to the often one-sidedly critical debate on the role of hierarchy in organizations, making the question of functionality the starting point of the analysis. Based on two empirical cases, such an analysis is carried out against the background of equivalence-functionalist assumptions. In doing so, we point out the problems for which formal and informal hierarchy are identified as structural solutions. Furthermore, we show which consequences result from these problem/solution constellations. It becomes clear that the realization of post-bureaucratic working methods in the cases studied is characterized by the emergence of fields of tension between competing expectation structures both at organizational interfaces and within the post-bureaucratic units. The article concludes with a short summary and outlook on possibilities for further research building on the perspective proposed here.Downloads
Published
2021-06-10
How to Cite
Bull, Finn-Rasmus, and Judith Muster. 2021. “Hierarchy in the Field of Tension Between Competing Expectations: Folgen Der Einführung postbürokratischer Arbeitsweisen in Großorganisationen”. Journal für Psychologie 29 (1):72-92. https://doi.org/10.30820/0942-2285-2021-1-72.
Issue
Section
Artikel
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Journal für Psychologie
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This license allows private use and unmodified distribution, but prohibits editing and commercial use (further information can be found at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
The terms of the Creative Commons licence only apply to the original material. The reuse of material from other sources (marked with a reference) such as charts, illustrations, photos and text extracts may require further permission for use from the respective copyrights holder.