On the Critique of Psychology
Thomas Slunecko and Gerhard Benetka in Conversation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30820/0942-2285-2022-1-6Keywords:
Critique of psychology, ambivalence of success, individuocentrism, naturalization, epistemologyAbstract
In celebration of the 30th anniversary of the existence of the Journal of Psychology, we address the essential and persisting factors of the critique of psychology that has been smouldering since the criticism of science of the student movement. The central questions are why this critique has had little influence on the mainstream of psychological research and teaching and what the lasting success of mainstream psychology, which has been only slightly touched by this critique, grounds on. Within the context of the measures for quality assurance of science that currently shape the practice of academic research, »success« proves to be an ambivalent term. This holds true for strategies of dissemination, research documentation and public presentation of research outcomes. While discussing the currently restrictive conditions of research and teaching at the university, we also point out, to some extent, possible niches and alternatives.Downloads
How to Cite
Slunecko, Thomas, and Gerhard Benetka. 2022. “On the Critique of Psychology: Thomas Slunecko and Gerhard Benetka in Conversation”. Journal für Psychologie 30 (1):6-25. https://doi.org/10.30820/0942-2285-2022-1-6.
Issue
Section
Artikel
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This license allows private use and unmodified distribution, but prohibits editing and commercial use (further information can be found at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
The terms of the Creative Commons licence only apply to the original material. The reuse of material from other sources (marked with a reference) such as charts, illustrations, photos and text extracts may require further permission for use from the respective copyrights holder.