The Struggle to Distinguish Transcendental Phenomenology and Psychology

Authors

  • Christopher Gutland
  • Alexander Nicolai Wendt

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30820/0942-2285-2023-1-103

Keywords:

transcendental phenomenology, eidetic psychology, psychologism, Husserl, epistemology, consciousness, methodology

Abstract

This article addresses Husserl’s attempt to differentiate between transcendental phenomenology and eidetic psychology. The thesis is: The distinction remained problematic so that Husserl’s analyses are often valuable contributions to psychology that, however, are mistaken to be epistemology. It is shown how and why the confusion of epistemological and psychological investigations harbors the danger of a psychologism. The article shows how becoming conscious of consciousness leads to a kind of reduplication of the world and why this led Husserl to give psychology an epistemological priority. On the other hand, it considers where and how the concern of epistemology and psychological investigations on the genesis of consciousness can be methodologically separated. Finally, it offers perspectives on how Husserl’s psychological contributions can be made fruitful for the project of a phenomenological psychology.

Author Biographies

Christopher Gutland

Christopher Gutland, PhD, is Associate Professor at the Department of Philosophy, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou(浙江大学哲学学院), China. His main research interests are phenomenology, epistemology, German idealism, and consciousness research.

Alexander Nicolai Wendt

Alexander Nicolai Wendt, PhD, is a post-doctoral researcher at the Psychological Department of the Ruprecht-Karls-University of Heidelberg and a PhD student at the Department of Human Sciences of the Università degli Studi di Verona. His research interests include psychology of thought, theoretical psychology, and phenomenological psychology.
103-124 34096

Downloads

How to Cite

Gutland, Christopher, and Alexander Nicolai Wendt. 2023. “The Struggle to Distinguish Transcendental Phenomenology and Psychology”. Journal für Psychologie 31 (1):103-24. https://doi.org/10.30820/0942-2285-2023-1-103.