Arranged Contingency
On the Temporal-Normative Orientation of Fridays for Future
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30820/0942-2285-2026-1-187Keywords:
sociology of time, sociology of knowledge, normativity, contingency, utopia, ecological crisis, temporal imperativeAbstract
The point of departure of this article is the diagnosis of a crisis of temporal orientation under late-modern conditions. It examines how the climate movement Fridays for Future responds to this crisis and establishes new normative standards. From a sociology of knowledge perspective that conceives of time as a normative ordering principle, the case analysis of the blog series »Summer of Utopias« (Fridays for Future 2021) reconstructs how different temporal modes are narratively interwoven within the movement’s discourse. Their interplay gives rise to the case structure of arranged contingency, in which possibilities and obligations are perspectivally related to one another. As an expression of a late-modern search for temporal coherence under conditions of radical contingency, a utopian temporal imperative can be derived from this structure, which renders contingency manageable through moral and political responsibility.
Downloads
How to Cite
Maier, Kevin. 2026. “Arranged Contingency: On the Temporal-Normative Orientation of Fridays for Future”. Journal für Psychologie 34 (1):187-206. https://doi.org/10.30820/0942-2285-2026-1-187.
Issue
Section
Artikel
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This license allows private use and unmodified distribution, but prohibits editing and commercial use (further information can be found at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
The terms of the Creative Commons licence only apply to the original material. The reuse of material from other sources (marked with a reference) such as charts, illustrations, photos and text extracts may require further permission for use from the respective copyrights holder.
