Beyond good taste?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30820/0942-2285-2020-2-147Keywords:
Veganism, renunciation, affection, responsibility, speciesism, compassion, qualitative researchAbstract
The contribution focuses on everyday moralizing practices in ethically-morally based veganism. By means of the interpretative analysis of selected interview sequences with Vegans from Germany, I reconstruct in how far vegan work of conviction opens up a society-critical perspective on the normalization of animal consumption. The interviewees relate to aspects of sustainability, ethics of responsibility and care in order to plausibilise the necessity of individual and social transformation processes. At the same time, other (sometimes unconscious) motives play a role. They aim at persuading fellow human beings to share the same convictions and pursue a vegan lifestyle. The power to act in shaping (intimate) social relationships contrasts with the felt powerlessness in the context of (anonymous) social structures and processes of animal consumption. A veganisation of the social environment often leads to tension in everyday life. The interviewees seek to address these tensions preemptively by making use of promising strategies of vegan persuasion.Downloads
Published
2020-12-10
How to Cite
Thrun, Rebecca. 2020. “Beyond Good Taste?”. Journal für Psychologie 28 (2):147-70. https://doi.org/10.30820/0942-2285-2020-2-147.
Issue
Section
Schwerpunkt
License
This license allows private use and unmodified distribution, but prohibits editing and commercial use (further information can be found at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
The terms of the Creative Commons licence only apply to the original material. The reuse of material from other sources (marked with a reference) such as charts, illustrations, photos and text extracts may require further permission for use from the respective copyrights holder.